212 lượt xem

Trump: “Ceasefire Not Necessary” in Russia–Ukraine War, Peace Can Be Achieved Amid Conflict

Washington, D.C. – August 18, 2025 — During a high-profile meeting at the White House with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, U.S. President Donald Trump stated that a ceasefire agreement is not required in order to bring an end to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine.

Trump Says Peace Is Possible Without a Ceasefire

Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump responded to a reporter who questioned whether his administration still intended to impose “severe consequences” if Russia failed to agree to a 30-day ceasefire.

“I don’t think you need a ceasefire,” Trump said. “If you look at the six deals I’ve settled this year, all of them happened while the countries involved were still at war. I didn’t negotiate any ceasefires. It might be good to have, but I understand strategically why one side or the other might oppose it.”

Although he acknowledged the humanitarian benefits of a ceasefire — namely, an immediate halt to casualties — Trump reiterated that peace negotiations could and should continue even during active combat.

“I like the idea of a ceasefire because it stops people from dying right away,” he added. “But we can still work on a peace agreement while they’re fighting. They have to fight. I wish they could stop — I really do — but strategically, stopping might be a disadvantage for one of them.”

President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House Aug. 18, 2025, where Trump said a ceasefire agreement is not necessary
President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House Aug. 18, 2025, where Trump said a ceasefire agreement is not necessary

Referencing Previous Peace Deals in 2025

Trump cited his earlier diplomatic efforts in 2025 as examples of how peace can be brokered without a formal ceasefire. These included:

  • A peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda in June.

  • A resolution between Armenia and Azerbaijan signed earlier this August.

In both cases, Trump emphasized, the nations involved were actively engaged in conflict when peace was negotiated.

Trump Rejects “Mere Ceasefire” Approach

In a Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump explained why his approach does not prioritize ceasefires:

“It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, and not a mere ceasefire agreement, which often times do not hold up.”

This marked a shift from his stance earlier this year, when he celebrated the success of a ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan in May. However, with regard to Ukraine, Trump now believes that lasting peace must be reached through direct negotiations rather than temporary truces.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shakes hands with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shakes hands with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office

Meeting with Putin Yields No Ceasefire, but Diplomatic Pressure Mounts

Last week, Trump held a highly anticipated face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Although the talks did not result in a ceasefire or peace deal, Trump warned ahead of the meeting that Russia could face “severe consequences” if it refused to cooperate.

Following that meeting, Trump suggested that Ukraine should consider a land-swap deal with Russia, calling it the most efficient path to ending the war — a proposal likely to stir controversy both domestically and internationally.

European Leaders Join Zelenskyy at the White House

Ukrainian President Zelenskyy was joined in Washington on Monday by several European heads of state, including:

  • French President Emmanuel Macron

  • UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer

  • German Chancellor Friedrich Merz

  • Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni

  • Finnish President Alexander Stubb

These leaders, unlike Trump, have advocated strongly for a full ceasefire as a prerequisite to any peace negotiations. Their coordinated presence at the White House signals growing international pressure on the U.S. to commit to a multilateral solution grounded in international law and humanitarian principles.

Bài viết cùng chủ đề: